Magical Trade
Friday, January 27, 2023
  • Home
  • Trade News
  • Email Whitelisting
  • Privacy Policy
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Trade News
  • Email Whitelisting
  • Privacy Policy
No Result
View All Result
Magical Trade
No Result
View All Result
Home Trade News

NYSE’s Tuesday trading glitch explained

by
January 24, 2023
in Trade News
0
0
SHARES
2
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

RELATED POSTS

3 investing lessons from the Club’s meeting Friday

Insana says there’s more evidence of slowing inflation and other central banks are noticing

In this article

WFCUPS

A trader works on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange.
Peter Kramer | CNBC

The New York Stock Exchange experienced technical issues at the open Tuesday. Dozens of stocks opened at prices well above or below their prior day closing prices. Most were halted shortly after the open under rules designed to damp down excessive volatility, and most reopened five to 10 minutes after the open at prices much closer to yesterday’s closing prices.

Stocks affected included big names like Altria, Mastercard, McDonalds, Uber, Wells Fargo, Verizon, Rio Tino, Shell, AT&T, Lilly, Mosaic, Wells Fargo, Nike, Nucor, Transocean, Prudential,3M, Newmont Mining, Southern, United Pacific, Sony, United Parcel Service, Altria, Valero Energy, Occidental Petroleum, Royal Dutch Shell, MetLife, Visa, Walmart, and Exxon Mobil.

The Big Board, owned and operated by the Intercontinental Exchange

Just prior to 11:00 a.m. ET, the NYSE issued a second statement: “The exchange continues to investigate issues with today’s opening auction. In a subset of symbols, opening auctions did not occur. The exchange is working to clarify the list of symbols. Impacted member firms may consider filing for Clearly Erroneous or Rule 18 Claims.”

“Clearly Erroneous” means the NYSE would determine that the initial prices in the stocks affected were not valid trades and the NYSE would determine that a later price would be the “correct” opening price.

What happened?

Every day, stocks open at the NYSE at or near 9:30 a.m. ET. There is only a single opening price, which is determined by thousands of orders to buy and sell individual stocks. These orders are aggregated into a single “book” for each stock that gauges overall supply and demand. A single price is then quoted at the open and all orders are aggregated into a single opening “auction print.”

For whatever reason, it appears that many orders to buy and sell stocks did not make it into the order book that determines the opening price, and that the opening auction print did not happen in those stocks affected.

The effect was that many stocks opened on very low volume and due to a supply-demand imbalance opened at prices far away from their closing price Monday.

To give two examples: Mosaic closed Monday at $48.35, but opened at $40.29, a drop of about 16%. It was halted almost immediately, but reopened at 9:43 a.m. at $48.00.

Walmart closed Monday at $142.64 but opened at $159.88, a jump of 12%. It, too, was almost immediately halted and reopened at 9:40 a.m. ET at $141.51.

What will the NYSE do?

The NYSE has already hinted it may bust all the initial trades of companies affected when it said, “Impacted member firms may consider filing for Clearly Erroneous or Rule 18 Claims.”

This is the most likely path because many investors who, for example, put in a market order to sell Mosaic at the open this morning were clearly burned (it opened down 16%) and would likely threaten lawsuits if not made whole, since the price drop had nothing to do with the company or external events.

Most likely, the “correct” opening price will be the price when the stocks reopened.

So what happened?

The NYSE has not provided an explanation. However, in the past these types of outages have been associated with software or security upgrades that caused snafus in the system.

On July 8, 2015, trading was halted for nearly four hours after the NYSE experienced what it called an “internal technical issue.” The NYSE later said, “The root cause was determined to be a configuration issue.”

In a separate event, faulty software brought down Knight Trading in August, 2012, in an incident which sent enormous amounts of erroneous orders onto the trading floor. The incident forced to Knight to sell out to a group of trading firms.

“Nine times out of ten, these problems happen because of a software change in the system,” one market participant who asked to remain anonymous, told me.

ShareTweetPin

Related Posts

3 investing lessons from the Club’s meeting Friday

by
January 27, 2023
0

Every weekday the CNBC Investing Club with Jim Cramer holds a "Morning Meeting" livestream at 10:20 a.m. ET. Here's a...

Insana says there’s more evidence of slowing inflation and other central banks are noticing

by
January 27, 2023
0

Federal Reserve Board Chairman Jerome Powell holds a news conference following the announcement that the Federal Reserve raised interest rates...

FDA proposal would allow gay men in monogamous relationships to donate blood

by
January 27, 2023
0

A nurse fills test tubes with blood to be tested during an American Red Cross bloodmobile in Fullerton, CA on...

A further stock rally will be ‘like bathing in lava’ for market bears, BofA says

by
January 27, 2023
0

Investors betting against the stock market have taken their lumps in 2023 and could be in for more trouble ahead,...

Body camera footage from Paul Pelosi attack released

by
January 27, 2023
0

Paul Pelosi (L) and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) attend the 2018 White House Correspondents' Dinner at Washington Hilton...

Next Post

Rupert Murdoch calls off proposed Fox-News Corp merger

Best TradingView Indicator: Which Ones Should You Use?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

email

Get the daily email about stock.

Please Enter Your Email Address:



By opting in you agree to our Privacy Policy. You also agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

MOST VIEWED

  • Fund manager believes FAANG is dead — says now it’s all about MANTA

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Forget Tesla — this auto stock is the one to buy right now, analyst says

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Bank of America names its top global tech stocks — including one it says has upside of 100%

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Josh Brown says Nvidia’s potential is ‘scary’ ahead of a potential AI boom

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Cut Your Retirement Spending Now, Says Creator of the 4% Rule

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Home
  • Trade News
  • Email Whitelisting
  • Privacy Policy
All rights reserved by www.magicaltrade.net
No Result
View All Result
  • Email Whitelisting
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy

All rights reserved by www.magicaltrade.net